false
OasisLMS
Catalog
ASGE Masterclass: Expert Performance Approach to C ...
To Clip or Not to Clip
To Clip or Not to Clip
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
Delayed bleeding is the most common complication after electrocautery-based colon polyp resection and often leads to hospitalization and repeat procedures. A randomized trial comparing microprocessor-controlled currents (force coagulation vs Endocut) showed no difference in delayed bleeding; Endocut increased immediate bleeding and had slightly more perforations. Cold resection can reduce delayed bleeding but may increase recurrence, so patient factors and follow-up reliability matter. Epinephrine in injectate reduces immediate bleeding but can cause post-procedure pain and doesn’t prevent delayed bleeding; topical gels were ineffective in a trial. Mechanical closure is most effective: multiple RCTs and meta-analyses support clip closure for lesions ≥20 mm in the proximal colon (right/transverse) when electrocautery is used; it’s cost-effective for high-risk lesions. Clips are less effective in the left colon, possibly due to early dislodgement. Proper clip technique and recognizing “clip artifact” (granulation/inflamed bumps mimicking recurrence) are emphasized; pit pattern helps differentiate true recurrence.
Asset Subtitle
Doug Re
Keywords
delayed post-polypectomy bleeding
electrocautery colon polyp resection
Endocut vs force coagulation trial
cold snare resection recurrence risk
prophylactic clip closure proximal colon ≥20 mm
clip artifact vs polyp recurrence pit pattern
×
Please select your language
1
English